Howard Dean hates kittens

Not really, but photoshop can be fun :)

the Comparison between Vietnam and Iraq

Well there's no Comparison

Sign the appeal

A victory for the Feminist

Well if your a female chimp its a victory

Townsend said: "There is a widespread belief in scientific literature that male and female chimpanzees differ greatly in their nature.

"It's true that males are much more often seen to engage in extreme physical violence than females, and this has led to the notion of violent and demonic males in contrast to quite peaceful females. However, our research shows that, under the right socio-ecological circumstances, these chimp gender stereotypes collapse completely. If their resources are under threat, females can become just as violently aggressive as males."

Scott Ritter gets mean

Former wepons inspector Scott Ritter writes an Op-ed that rips our troops with the most vile acustions and those of us who support them...And to show how the left finds any excuse to attack our efforts in the War on Terror, his op-ed was in response to a editoral by Alan Dershowitz about of all things Holocaust deniers.

The Geneva Conventions states

I posted this on my gwillie.com E-George Update page, It's archived now, anyway I am reposting this in light of recent news from Iraq. It is good to be reminded that our guys are much better than the scumbags we fight. Even though we don't have to be.

Our Strength is our regard for life, the light we share freely that will shine through in the end.
Our Hope lies in the opportunity that will come to the children of our enemies as the freedoms we hold dear come to them.
Our Victory will come when the lies of our enemy are exposed by the light of truth.

The Geneva Conventions states
That the relationship between the "High Contracting Parties" (that’s us) and a non-signatory (that’s them), the party will remain bound until the non-signatory no longer acts under the strictures of the convention.
Something like this.
PFC Thomas Lowell Tucker and PFC Kristian Menchaca were ambushed and murdered
. Their bodies mutilated and boobied trapped, all in clear violation of Geneva. The terrorist claim this was in retaliation for a rape and murder allegedly committed by members of they’re unit. This is not true because the crime was unknown until long after these war crimes against our soldiers. This is just 1 example of many.
I thank God we have been able to keep our brave soldiers out of enemy hands.

My response to a Kos post full of hate

A while back the Daily Kos had a post titled Why I hate America he quotes one of the witnesses from the House committee on un-American activities.

I like how Paul Robeson answered that question before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1956: "My father was a slave and my people died to build this country, and I'm going to stay right here and have a part of it, just like you. And no fascist-minded people like you will drive me from it. Is that clear?"

Paul Robeson was a name I had not heard so I looked him up found he was a member of the Communist Party USA. He was an apologist for Stalin’s mass-murdering tyranny, and a recipient of the Lenin Prize for his service to the Soviet cause.

But all this is just background to how I found this little tidbit of communist truth that makes it an imperative that the Communist Party be thrown onto the trash heap as soon as possible.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

We believe and advocate that a socialist society in our country will guarantee all the liberties defined in the Bill of Rights but never fully realized. These include the right of people to express themselves fully and freely through organizations of their choice and competing candidates who respect and are guided by the concept of building socialism.

I did a little checking on the Commie Party, USA. Among all the other hogwash of the “joys of socialism” the above statement shows the true nature of the movement. Please note the “freedom” to choose competing candidates “who respect and are guided by the concept of building socialism”. I have always known that Communism (even under the guise of Socialism) can not tolerate dissent, and even in their public statements they can’t hide it.

And I have to wonder what kind of "organizations of their choice" they will allow; something tells me my church will not be among them.

Freedom fights on

In the spirit of the long forgotten freedom gathering at Tiananmen Square, crushed by the full force of China's communist military, some brave resistance fighter(s) chucked a burning object at the huge portrait of the Mass murder Mao Zedong. The portrait was damaged and police evacuated the square while searching for the brave hero(s) of freedom. The picture will be replaced tonight and security will be increased. An extra death squad has been dispatched.

A vandal damaged the giant portrait of China's late Chairman Mao Zedong that hangs over the Forbidden City on Saturday, prompting police to clear the area and adjacent Tiananmen Square, witnesses said.

Remember the Cultural Revolution?

Despite leading the country in a series of violent political movements that saw millions purged or killed and left the economy moribund, Mao is still revered by many in China and is seen as a symbol of its strength and unity.

Never forget the fight goes on!

When blowing yourself up is not enough

Singing praises to Allah on myspace!!!

Before you hate me

I want you to think of anyone you know who's been thru this and then judge for yourself whether this report is fact or propaganda.

I am not going to say what this post is about because it would just be too controversial. This is the far lefts most important issue. The one thing sure to get me noticed on this blog, not in a good way, by the far left.

These are the facts they hide from us to keep their ideals alive. They attack anyone who dares to point out what most of us would know is true just by using common sense. They want to hide the risk from the people they profit from and the people the exploit. When they began they followed an idealism that has now been so completely debunked we had a war to end it, eugenics. Yet even though they deny they seek this end they offer their services mostly to the poor and to minorities with 73% of their offices being in neighborhoods where they can reach both. They fight to have access to our children, to hide what they do from their parents. They claim they only wish to protect them from potential abuse yet they do not report the worst kind of abuse over and over, the sexual exploitation of these young children by older men. They control what you see and hear about this subject in the media, they brand any dissent with hateful rhetoric. When you challenge them you challenge the “very ideals of human rights”. They have gained power in this nation, in fact, the world. They gained power over governments using fear and intimidation. They gained control of one party and used the media to silence the other. They claim one side votes based only on this issue. The famous 1 issue voter, yet when you look at the candidates only one party has people running on both sides of this issue, and it’s not theirs. Only one party allows speakers at their convention to speak who hold a different view on this issue, and it’s not theirs. Only one party debates this issue year after year, and it’s not theirs. For them the issue is settled, no need to think of the pain that has affected millions. No need to debate at all, in fact debate is the last thing they want, the status quo is just what they want and debate may expose the true cost they have worked so hard to hide. They could not argue for the status quo if the true cost were known.

Want to know more?

5/14/07
Update: here is another important link on this subject.

How others think of me

I found this story on a far left blog. I thought it showed perfectly why I face so much hate at anti-war protests. It’s not just that I am there presenting another view of the war they oppose so strongly, it’s that I am the most full and extreme example of racism and hate on the planet today. I find these very words shouted at me every time I face the far left, so while I know this story is not about me, it shows the attitude of so many on the far left who choose hate over debate

How I think

This is a video of Evan Sayet speaking at the Heritage Foundation. He points out in the clearest way how liberals (far left) think.

The lie that got two men put in jail

This is the story of a liar who smuggled drugs into the US and got shot in the process. The true story has I know it is that he was caught, ran back to the border, was chased by agents was almost caught, one agent was on the ground the other then fired on the smuggler the smuggler kept running and got away. The agents then picked up all the shells and did not report the shooting. (that is a crime.) Later the smuggler was granted immunity to testify. He was then arrested smuggling again and was released under the same immunity.
Now the El Paso Times has his view.

He takes great offense at being referred to as a "drug smuggler," he said, because he only did it once.

Allow me to offend the "drug smuggler" He got busted again while the trial was on going so I'm calling BS!!!

Now keep an eye on this

Aldrete Davila's urethra was shattered by the bullet two years ago, and he still lives with a rubber tube sticking out of his belly button that connects his bladder to a plastic bag.
--snip--
Agent Compean shot at him several times and Agent Ramos,once, hitting him.
--snip--
Getting the bullet removed from his thigh in 2005 was his only motivation for testifying against the agents, he said.

I didn't know your urethra was in your thigh!

What they don't mention is that he fled in another truck waiting inside Mexico. The injuries he is claiming would not allow him to flee any further.

Now, getting some money to rebuild his urethra is the only reason he filed a multi million lawsuit against the U.S. federal government, he said. Aldrete Davila said several Mexican hospitals have asked him for at least $30,000

A multi million dollar lawsuit for a $30,000 operation. Well I guess the extra money will put his urethra back where it belongs?

"Everybody hates me there (in America)," he said.

Well he's not dumb.

Sobe H2O

Ok so I just watched a commercial for Sobe's new product. It's a fine commercial just one thing, they claim it's full of anti-oxidants, but isn't water 1/3 oxygen?

A lie in the mainstream.

A new Newsweek poll has the presidents approval down to 29% +or– 7%. That is compared to the normal 3 to 4% margin of error for most polls, Why is this so high? Because they over sampled democrats. This distorted number is now in the mainstream and the story is a lie.

The NEWSWEEK Poll was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International May 2-3. Telephone interviews were conducted with 1,001 adults, age 18 and older; the overall margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points. The margin of error for questions asked only of Democrats and Democratic leaners is plus or minus 7 percentage points; for Republicans and GOP leaners, 8 percentage points.

Note: I’ve always wondered how asking 1000 people in a nation of 300,000,000 can tell you anything important. I know they have a math formula for that but it would only take 1 bad apple to twist this how they want it, and it looks like they did just that. Here are some more numbers:

Yes, this would be a devastating poll, if one could rely on it. It contradicts nearly every other poll, which has consistently shown Giuliani beating Obama, Clinton, and Edwards. How could Newsweek get the results they have published?

Well, for one thing, it helps when you poll 50% more Democrats than Republicans. If one reads the actual poll results all the way to the end, the penultimate question shows that the sample has 24% Republicans to 36% Democrats. Compare that to the information given by Newsweek's NBC partners in February, which showed that party affiliation had shifted from a difference of less than a percentage point to a gap of 3.9 points -- 34.3% to 30.4%, with 33.9% independents.

I took Saturday off.

I didn't post on Saturday, Just didn't have much to say. I have decided that this bloging is good for me. It forces me to practice my spelling, (well at least practice using my spell checker) and it forces me to keep informed so i can post good post. :) Not to mention the discipline involved in writing at least 1 post every day.

Inside the Green House: Extent of deception

Here is a story from Reuters on the 3rd IPCC report on global warming. I think it shows the extent of deception on the issue of climate change. I'll point them out as we go.

Humans need to make sweeping cuts in greenhouse gas emissions over the next50 years to keep global warming in check, but it need only cost a tiny fraction of world economic output, a major U.N. climate report said on Friday.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in the third of a series of reports, said keeping the rise in temperatures to within 2 degrees Celsius would cost only 0.12 percent of annual gross domestic product.

Note the cost is only 0.12% of GDP, this is to keep the change at only 2 degrees, and the implication is that it will be much more if we don't pay up now.

--Now I cut this part it's just some words from a guy on the panel from Greenpeace.--

To keep within the 2-degree threshold that scientists and the European Union say is needed to stave off disastrous changes to the world's climate, emissions of carbon dioxide needed to drop between 50 and 85 percent by 2050, the report said.

However, technological advances -- particularly in producing and using energy more efficiently -- meant such targets were within reach, the report said.

Note we need to drop emissions by 50 to 85% also note that they acknowledge that we are already making progress in that direction.

It highlighted the use of nuclear, solar and wind power, more
energy-efficient buildings and lighting, as well as capturing and storing carbon dioxide spewed from coal-fired power stations and oil and gas rigs.

Just try to build a new nuclear plant, and how many acres of land are environmentalist will to give up to fields of solar panels, and senator. Kennedy will never let a wind power farm ruin his view.

The panel also said for the first time that lifestyle changes could help fight global warming. It gave no examples, but IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri said his personal suggestions included turning down the thermostat and eating less red meat, which could cut animal methane emissions. "These are lifestyle measures but you are not going to give up anything and you might gain," he told a news conference.

Except a good steak.

Here’s the kicker...

China wanted the IPCC report to exclude language which would promote stabilizing emissions near current levels, in part because of the limited economic studies available. The steeper the emissions cuts, the more costly to the global economy, the report said. The cost of limiting greenhouse gases in 2030 to stabilization" levels of between 445 and 710 ppm (parts per million)CO2-equivalent ranges from a 3 percent decrease of global GDP to a small increase, it said.

Now remember when they said that it would only cost 0.12% of GDP now it 3%?

However, regional costs might differ significantly from global averages, it added. Greenhouse gas concentrations are now at about 430 ppm CO2-equivalent.

Wait Current levels are lower then the goals for 30 years from now? Why is it then that we have to reduce emissions by more than 50%?

my past green house reports:
Twofer
Cow Farts
Global Warming Update

Yes Harry Lets leave Iraq...

To this...

The plot at the Huda Girls' school in Tarmiya was a "sophisticated and
premeditated attempt to inflict massive casualties on our most innocent
victims," military spokesman Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said.

The democrats want us to leave. Our troops want to save these people from this sort of evil.

A Rush-ism

One of the things Rush Limbaugh talks about is the way libs try to humanize SUVs in their pursuit to have them banned. Any accident involving an SUV it is the SUV that did it, not the driver.

Can you tell a lie you never told?

The far left has claimed over and over that the President proclaimed Mission Accomplished on board the USS Abraham Lincoln 4 years ago. This has been so pervasive that it has been accepted as fact almost universally. Well the truth is Bush never said that in fact, he made it clear that we still had a long way to. This is proof that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes truth.

Wednesday night lights

The new conspiracy theory

Learn the truth of 429

Immigration and refugees

This is a subject I don’t like to talk about a lot because the other side has captured the language on this. When you try to offer solutions other then the ones the left want, i.e. Full amnesty of all illegal emigrants, you are a racist. If you call for enforcing the law you’re a racist. If you call for securing the border you’re a racist. If you call for law enforcement to check on the immigration status of people they arrest for crimes you’re a racist. The United States of America allows more legal emigrants than any other nation. Every illegal emigrant takes a slot that is no longer available for legal emigrants. Every employer who knowingly hires an illegal emigrant steals from every tax payer. That employer also steals from his employee by under paying him. He undercuts his competition with cheaper labor cost. He most likely is not paying taxes or under reporting them. This is a form of slavery, one that is embraced by the far left as it fits the agenda of undermining the USA.

So my easy answer is the full enforcement of existing laws. This was promised to us in the 80s after the Reagan amnesty plan but it blocked by forces on both side of the aisle. This bipartisan betrayal has made it all but imposable to enforce the existing laws. About 10% of the population of Mexico now lives at least part time in the USA. When 10% of your population flees to a neighboring nation for economic relief, it is not an emigration problem, it is a refuge problem. I propose that we change the language on this issue and declare it a refugee problem. This opens the door for a form of temporary legalization for illegal emigrants. As refugees we can seek UN aid. We can put international pressure on Mexico to resolve its economic disaster its corruption and its drug crime culture.

For years the far left has attacked any attempts to bring sanity to the emigration issue. The right has not wanted to risk the economy by removing the source of cheep labor. Now that the issue has reached a critical mass, we have millions of families that are “mixed paper” parents who are illegal and children who are citizens. This has turned the issue of enforcing the law into an emotional one, filling the left’s armory of rhetoric allowing them to demonize anyone who challenges their emigration agenda. While the right uses the risk to the economy to argue largely for the status quo.

So although my suggestion is drastic I see it as the only way to truly address the issue with the urgency it deserves. As long as the refugees obey the law and the international community works toward resolving the crisis in Mexico. We can work to help our neighbors to the south live a better life both here and at home.

You don't have to be lost anymore

I found a map that will guide you thru the world of the Internet online community

Your Fired

There's not much I can add to this.

Neighbors watched in horror as Upendra Yadav was dragged out of his house in Jharkhand state on Friday by his angry employer. The employer's father and
brother held Yadav down before he was beheaded with a sword, police said.

I told you but I was wrong.

When I wrote my post about the “fund the retreat bill” I predicted that our enemy’s may try to weaken the Presidents hand in the political fight over the bill... Well today is likely the day that the veto will comedown and I can not find any news of such attempts. I have a few hours yet so maybe I have a chance, but remember I only said that they may try.

I also believe that our enemies will, sometime over the weekend, offer a false
truce to add pressure on the President to sign the bill.

So anyway in my attempts to find proof I was right I found evidence that the lefties are not reporting the whole story of the Presidents diplomatic efforts in the Middle East. Here is a well sourced story pointing to our efforts to aid in a peaceful transfer of power in Lebanon


Other post on this subject:
I told you so again
Almost so
1st of many
fund the retreat bill